All member states of the European Union have also become party to the Convention on Jurisdiction, Applicable Law, Recognition, Enforcement and Co-operation in Respect of Parental Responsibility and Measures for the Protection of Children , which largely overlaps with this regulation. For cases within the European Union, the regulation takes precedence over the convention. The authorization was necessary as the European Union and the member states had a shared competence over all matters of the convention and as the convention did not provide for the signature of "Regional Economic Integration Organizations". He ought to have held that the provisions of article 19 of the Council Regulation were applicable and could not be overridden by the Agreement.

Author:Yogar Vojind
Language:English (Spanish)
Published (Last):13 February 2017
PDF File Size:13.51 Mb
ePub File Size:19.38 Mb
Price:Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]

Doujinn Deadline for transposition in the Member States. Read more about the BIS. The provisions of Article 19, paragraph 2, BR II are not applicable where a court of a Member State first seised for the purpose of obtaining measures in matters of parental responsibility is seised only for the purpose of its granting provisional measures within the meaning of Article 20 of that Regulation and where a court of another Member State which has jurisdiction as to the substance of the matter within the meaning nis the same regulation is seised second of an action directed at obtaining the same measures, whether on a provisional basis or as final measures.

The first question that has to be answered is at what time a legal proceeding is regarded to be started officially. Brussels II — Wikipedia Central bank hub The BIS facilitates dialogue, collaboration and information-sharing among central banks and other authorities that are responsible for promoting financial stability.

Article 16 Seizing of a court A court shall be deemed to be seised: Under the Regulation, any EU country must automatically recognise judgments given in another EU country on matrimonial and parental responsibility matters.

This site uses cookies to improve your browsing experience. Section 3 Chapter II Common provisions for determining jurisdiction. A single legal instrument to help international couples resolve disputes, involving more than one country, over their divorce and the custody of their children. This may result in parallel actions and consequently the possibility of irreconcilable judgments on the same issue.

Security, privacy and the need for cooperation to fight cyber threats. Third country issuers are not subject to a requirement, under Annex I, item A welfare authority or a youth authority may, for instance, be competent to take provisional measures under national law. Where the jurisdiction of the court first seised is established, the court second seised shall decline jurisdiction in favour of that court. Tell us what you think about the summaries! The right of defence of a party has to be guaranteed.

The wrong words are highlighted. Because the goods had not been exported and hence there was no entitlement to exemption under Article 39 of the VAT Code, the question once again is whether the Belgian tax authorities could have been led to conclude that the transactions between Umicore hrusel the Swiss company were fictitious, that the real transactions had occurred between Umicore and C, and that these transactions might be exempt in line with Articl e 3 9 bis o f t he VAT Code.

After the protective measure has been taken, the national court is not required to transfer the case to the court of another Member State having jurisdiction. Most frequent English dictionary requests: The difference in rules between the Member States also affects the very notion of lis pendens. Article 19 BR II provides a mechanism whereby the court second seized declines its jurisdiction in favor of the court first seized.

It is also necessary to establish a similar rule for examining admissibility, involving staying the proceedings so long as it is not shown that the respondent has been able to receive the document instituting the proceedings or an equivalent document in sufficient time to enable him to arrange for his defence, or that all necessary steps have been taken to this end.

Once the divorce ruling was final in Sweden, however, the interested party could apply to a court in Austria, in order to ensure that those effects of the divorce which would be null under Austrian law would have the necessary effects ex tunc brusdl opposed to divorce which has only effects ex nunc, bearing in mind, moreover, that the recognition of the scope of this Convention is restricted to changes in civil status see paragraph Skip to main content.

These measures, accordingly, affect even matters that do not come within the scope of the Regulation. Brussels II Moreover, according to Article 17 BR IIwhere a court of one Member State is seised of a case over which it has no jurisdiction under that regulation and a court of another Member State has jurisdiction pursuant to that regulation, it is brusfl declare of its own motion that it has no jurisdiction.

The regulation concerns the jurisdiction responsible for parental responsibility, including the access to the child of the other parent. In relations between EU countries, it takes precedence over certain multilateral conventions:. TOP Related Articles.


Nařízení Brusel II



Brusel IIbis



Nařízení Brusel I bis


Related Articles